作者：程颖 陈军
　　【Abstract】Corrective feedback（CF）， as an important form in the interaction process， is the key to stimulate negotiated interaction to promote the second language development. The study adopts a pretest-treatment-posttest design with 30 senior high students as participants， whichpresents an in-depth analysis of CFin English speaking classrooms for senior high students in China. The key issue is whether CF differs quantitatively and qualitatively in different combinations in the aspects of their frequency， their outcomes and their effects.
　　【Key words】negotiated interaction； correct feedback； English speaking classrooms； English speaking competence
　　【作者簡介】程颖（1982.06-），女，汉族，华南师范大学在职硕士研究生，任教于广东省湛江市第二十中学，研究方向：高中英语教学；陈军（1977.10-），男，汉族，广东外语外贸大学英语本科毕业，中山大学硕士研究生，研究方向：教育管理。
　　1. Introduction
　　The Interaction Hypothesisstates that the development of language proficiencyis promoted by face-to-face interaction and communication. To answer the question how students can best be assisted viaclassroom interactions in becoming more target-like language， I sought to show how corrective feedback （CF）provided during negotiated interactionshapes interlanguagedevelopment.
　　2. Literature Review
　　There was a great body of study related to CF， butproblemsarose when adapted to the teaching and learning environment in China.So，， this study explores theiroccurringin student-student interaction in English speaking classroom， which is hoped to find a more effective and practical way of administering CF.
　　3. Research Design
　　3.1 Research Questions
　　In this study， I explore several questions related to CF：
　　（1） How frequent is CF in Groups？
　　（2）Dose CFdiffer qualitatively and quantitatively in different combination of interactions involving different proficiency levelsofstudents？
　　（3）Can CF promote students’speaking competence development？
　　3.2 Participants
　　The participants are30 students with different proficiency levels， low， middle and high English， who are senior high students. They form groups， combinations and dyads.
　　4. Results and Data Analysis
　　4.1 Data Summary of CF in Groups
　　Table 4.1 showed that five CF strategies were used by students， explicit correction， recast， clarification requests， elicitation and repetition. Among them， recast and clarification request were the two most frequently used （at rate 39.5% and 31.5% respectively） and metalinguistic feedback had not been used.